The ongoing shift is most pronounced in the growth of occupations defined as having a “high” digitalization level. A score of 60 or above marks an occupation as having a “high” digitalization level, and a score above 33 but below 60 is deemed “medium.” For a detailed methodology on how we constructed digitalization scores for jobs, industries, groups, and places, please refer to our 2017 report, “Digitalization and the American workforce.” The measures are standardized to range from 1 to 100, with higher digitalization scores representing higher digital content in that occupation. Brookings derives the measure from the O*NET survey, a unique occupational survey database from the Department of Labor that provides detailed, survey-based information on the skills, knowledge, tools, and work context of each occupation. ![]() The “digitalization score” of a job reflects the level and importance of digital content for that occupation. work jumped from 32 in 2002 to 44 in 2010, and continued to rise to 48 in 2020 (see text box below for an explanation on digitalization scores). 1 Looking across all jobs, the overall digitalization score of U.S. workforce-diffused into more and more jobs in the last decade, well beyond the levels reported in a 2017 Brookings report. To the first point, the digitalization trend-as measured by the digital content of 761 occupations, covering 98% of the U.S. The digitalization of work continues to expand And second, so are the benefits and divides it can bring. First, the digitalization of work is expanding. In reviewing recent digitalization trends, two key facts emerge. Digitalization empowers, digitalization divides: An update on recent trends In doing so, we outline the ways communities, states, philanthropies, corporations, and other organizations can leverage place-based approaches for addressing digital transformation and related economic development challenges. This report discusses this potential and how experiments in place-based problem-solving are accelerating digital skill-building and local economic development. Specifically, a new set of sizable “place-based” investment policies-focused on boosting innovation, tech clusters, and workforce training-suggests a potential playbook for responding more effectively to the need for not just digital inclusion, but also improved local opportunity more broadly. ![]() However, recent shifts in post-pandemic labor market demands coupled with a surge of new federal and state policy experiments are building the potential for a distinctive new policy paradigm-one that addresses the nation’s digitalization divide and the desperate need for skill-building and digital transformation in communities. In fact, digitalization divides across and within places now stand as one of the nation’s starkest limits on opportunity. Indeed, what is particularly concerning is the extent to which these divides have been playing out across the nation’s uneven geography of cities, towns, and rural communities. ![]() Such gaps can spawn troublesome divides among not just people, but also places. ![]() That’s because gaps in access to digital skills engender disparate access to the nation’s best-paying, most desirable jobs and industries. And it has inordinate power to both empower workers or divide them. Digitalization is the infusion of digital skills (though not necessarily higher-end software coding) into the texture of almost every job in the economy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |